Markets lower amid reports of slowing Chinese Economy

Hello Everyone

Markets closed significantly lower on Sept-22, largely due to additional reports that the economy in China is slowing down.  Lets take a look at some charts, the SP 500 Index itself and the “SPY” Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) which is a proxy for the SP 500 and often useful for volume analysis.

SP500-09-22-15 SP500-09-22-15-commentsSPY-ETF-09-22-15 SPY-ETF-09-22-15-comments

Evident via the charts is that the markets have closed down on above average trading volume days, and have had minimal “up days” on above average volume.   They indeed had those types of days on August 26, 27, and 28, but volume waned quickly and dropped off.  We are now approximately one-month since the late August sell-offs, and from my optic, the markets do not appear to be improving, and additional selling/distribution activity being observed is not conducive to an improvement of things.  My opinion is additional downward action is possible, over the next 30-90 days, as large participants such as large mutual funds and hedge funds slowly exit positions.

I remain 100% G-Fund.   Take care, I will plan on another update possibly in one to two weeks.   Thank you for reading.

– Bill Pritchard


Pre-Market futures down hard

I typically don’t post morning updates however Pre-Market futures are down hard, with Dow Futures down 200+ points this Sept-22 AM.

The market day may be challenging indeed.

-Bill Pritchard


FOMC does not raise rates

Hello Everyone

In the “I told you so” category, the FOMC declined to raise interest rates at its most recent meeting (Sept 17), stating that inflation data is still not at the target 2% level.

A PDF file with the actual press release, and key areas highlighted by me, is at this link:  FOMC-SEPT-17

Markets did not celebrate the lack of a rate hike, and closed lower at the end of the day.

I have no compelling reason to depart the safety of the G-Fund, and as such, I remain 100% G-Fund for now.

Everyone have a great weekend…

-Bill Pritchard

Market Analysis and FOMC meeting

Hello Folks

Hope everyone has been doing well.   Subscriber-ship has really taken off since the “crash” back in late August, thank you for the interest in the site.

Let me get started by saying that I remain 100% G-Fund.   This is due to my ongoing concern regarding weakness in the markets.   As many have pointed out to me, the markets indeed have tracked upward, however, this vector upward has (in my opinion) lacked sufficient volume to sustain anything.  An interesting note is that I submitted my TSP change to G-Fund on August 23, however due to the typically delay time in processing my request, and the subsequent up-tick in the markets after August 24, I did not exit “at the bottom” as one would believe.   I exited on an uptick.   The markets since have been mostly flat however.   Lets take a look at the SP 500:

SP-500-09-15-2015 SP-500-09-15-2015-comments

A few things become apparent after viewing these charts.  1) The overhead resistance level for the SP 500 is 2000, if we can get thru that, then I consider that a positive sign.  2)  Volume since August 24 has dropped off.   We have had no significant volume, on “up days”, at all.

Yes, we have had some days in which the volume was slightly higher than the prior day, resulting in some folks to celebrate, to include Investors Business Daily newspaper.   This publication 99.9% of the time is a solid and credible source of info, however via Twitter, I disagreed with a prior opinion piece they posted regarding a celebratory article on volume (they never replied back…).   In my opinion, the volume on the indexes is not high enough to warrant a jump back into the stock funds.

Combine the behavior of the markets themselves (the best signal of them all) along with the historical fact that the bull market (we are arguably in a correction now, but not full “bear mode”) is six years old, in addition to the above volume, my subsequent decision is to remain in the G-Fund.   I want the market to “prove to me” why I should return to stock funds, so far, it has not.

As many know, the FOMC is meeting on Sept 16/17, with a press conference planned for 2PM Eastern Time on Sept 17.   My opinion is that we do not see a rise in interest rates at this meeting.  I have been wrong before, and I will be wrong again, but my position is based on the fact that in numerous public statements, to include some before Congress, the FOMC is using two factors to decide interest rate hikes:   Unemployment/Labor Data and PCE Inflation Data.  For in-depth discussion of this, please see my March 12, 2015 post.

While the most recent data reflects that the labor market indeed is at the levels desired by the FOMC (in order to raise interest rates), the PCE Inflation Data is not.  12-month PCE Inflation as reported by the Dallas Federal Reserve is largely unchanged since January 2015.   Some believe that continuing to hold rates down is hurting things, and some pressure on the FOMC exists to just “get it over with” and go ahead and make the rate hike, which is a paltry .25%.   Many also believe that the tension and stress around the possible rate hike is more painful than the hike itself.   In any event, my opinion is that we do not see rates increased on Sept 17.

In the “Other” category, some things not TSP related but indeed related to your financial situation:  Something most folks I know (or at least the ones I hang out with…) are not aware of:   The Blue Cross Blue Shield Wellness Benefits Gym Membership benefits.   The link is at:

Take a look at the link, as I don’t want to misquote things, but long story short, it is $25 monthly gym membership per adult family member (if you have a family, your spouse needs to pay $25 in addition to the $25 employee membership, $50 total, and no child membership or plan exists….unless I read it wrong…), for access to numerous gyms across your city.   For example in Dallas, my membership gives me access to all LA Fitness and all Anytime Fitness (two different companies) facilities.

Another item of importance is the FEGLI Federal Life Insurance open season, from Sept 1 2016 until Sept 30 2016.   The most recent open seasons were 2004 and 1999, so you might take a look at this.  FEGLI is more expensive than other programs, but FEGLI is one of a few life insurance programs that will pay no matter how, or where, you die.   Sad as it sounds, it will pay in a suicide and pay if the death is in a war zone.   Not many (none that I have found to be exact…) life insurance programs will do this.   In the read the fine print category, if you have a non-FEGLI life insurance program, and you fly around on government aircraft, and/or get deployed to war zones or similar, you might want to check your policy.  When do you need life insurance ?   I am not a financial advisor, however big media types such as Suze Orman and Dave Ramsey seem to advocate to have life insurance until your oldest child is 25 years old, the theory being by that time, they are out of college and/or somewhat can live on their own.   Do your own research, as I am not a financial advisor or insurance person.

That is all I have for now….I remain 100% G-Fund.

Thanks for reading and please continue to share this site with your friends and co-workers.

– Bill Pritchard



China slowdown – Dow Futures down 200+ pts

Hello Folks

Well, last week we saw the markets rise, however volume on each “up day” was less than the prior day’s volume, classic signs of a rally with no steam.   Most rallies with any chance of lasting have strong volume behind them, and such volume tends to rise or be greater than the prior “up day”.   We are not seeing that right now.  Also, due to the price action on the SP 500 Index, we have a pending 50-day Moving Average and 200-day Moving Average crossover, which for some is considered an additional bearish signal.  For me, I have enough “go to the sidelines” signals, and I am in G-Fund.

Let’s look at some charts:


If we take a look at the above chart, the red arrow reflects the downward action of the Index, it is accompanied by rising volume, “backing up” the potential that the just-occurred movement (downward action) is strong (versus weak) and likely to endure (versus not endure).   The SP 500 Index finds a bottom in the 1870 area then on August 26, rallies higher.   For those who do not understand the importance of volume, many believed that “the storm clouds are behind us” and many talking heads on CNBC proclaimed that the market was back on track, having just “hiccupped” days earlier.   Others, like me, who study volume, were concerned with the high volume on the prior down days, and started to observe that the volume each “up day” was lesser than the prior “up day”.   Notice that while yes, the market did go up, on Aug-26, 27, 28, the volume went down.  Poor volume “reduces the credibility” of any potential reversal, with reduced probability that the perceived rally will endure.

Over the weekend, I also concluded that the only thing causing rallies, weak ones or not, was super positive headline news, and not the result of normal inflows into investments.   Absent super headline news, (such as reports that the Chinese government themselves were now buying zillion dollars of Chinese stocks) the markets fall apart a few days later.   A general “cloud” of worry seems to cover the landscape, and volatility is at record levels.   Note that in my opinion, the FOMC is not going to consider the stock market’s performance or what is happening in China, as part of their rate increase decision process.  It is also my opinion that we do not see a rate hike in September, but not because of China or the markets.  Furthermore, my opinion is that the previous well-intended plain vanilla FOMC statements are leaving the markets jittery, as they seek more clarity and try to determine the direction the FOMC is headed.

Poor and flawed information pushed out in the financial press, to include reports that “this is a standard correction”, are not helping investors.   I don’t recall 1000 point losses in one day (in mere minutes), nor mid-day White House Press Secretary live appearances to soothe investors, in “standard corrections”.

During the evening of Monday Aug-31, BBC Business released a report that China’s economy is indeed slowing down.  Nighttime Dow Jones Futures are trading 250 points down.   This is not the mark of a positive regular market day for Tuesday Sept 1, the day following a triple digit (115 points) loss on Monday.   The week is not exactly getting started well.  See chart:


In summary, my balance remains 100% G-Fund.   I lost a little on the way thru the exit door, but my account is protected from additional damage.

Let’s keep an eye on things this week.   Until then, take care and talk to you soon.

– Bill Pritchard


100% G-Fund – Market approaching Bear conditions

Good Evening Folks

As an update, I am now 100% G-Fund in my TSP, both my Contribution Allocations and Interfund Transfer now reflect 100% G-Fund.  I submitted this request on Sunday August-23 late PM.  When you are having trouble sleeping, the simple adage is “reduce your exposure until you can sleep again.”   In short, that is what happened, almost literally.

The SP 500 has penetrated the 2040 “support area” which was discussed in my July 8 post , this happened Thursday, late in the afternoon, then again on Friday, we saw additional damage caused.  It is unfortunate that our markets are almost controlled, to an extent, by what is happening overseas, versus the other way around.

Long-term, 3+ year look-back, we are still positive, lets take a look at the SP 500 chart.   Observe that this bull market (well, former bull market) got started in early 2009, so we are 6+ years into this, and the vitality and momentum of this mature market has indeed apparently ceased.   See weekly chart, which reduces the noise associated with daily price action:


So since 2009, we have enjoyed a mostly upward trend, with some turbulence along the way, but in light of the recent market behavior, I see “cracks appearing” and feel that a move to G-Fund is prudent.   I may lose some additional money as I exit, as the TSP processes my allocation request over two business days, however it takes months, not mere days, for a bear market to fully materialize.   Exiting this week, is much preferred over exiting three months from now, assuming this correction continues.

So what is a Bear Market?   Note that we are not in a bear market yet.  Most professional money managers define a bear market as 15% decline in an index from a recent all time high.   Note also that the Dow Jones only contains 30 companies, two of which are Oil companies (Oil is at $40 a barrel), two of which are PC-computer related- Intel and Microsoft, (does anybody go out and purposely buy a new PC these days), and some other companies that just are not keeping up with modern times.  So yes, the Dow is getting creamed.   But so are the other indexes.    So, to obtain bear status, our indexes need to reach (decimals not used):

Dow Jones:  15751

SP 500: 1815

NASDAQ:  4447

With the global turmoil underway, the vague statements by our FOMC, resulting in additional nervousness in the markets, the 2040 being penetrated twice on back to back days, and my overall lack of sleep due to the markets, I pulled the trigger and went G-Fund.

I hope everyone has a good week, and thank you for reading.

– Bill Pritchard


Markets down Hard

Well, like most folks, I just want this week to be over.  I mean, wow, just wow.  Almost 400 points negative on the Dow on Thursday.  Someone stop the bleeding.

As most market watchers know, all the stock indexes are down hard, due to multiple factors, mostly 1) the approaching September Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting in which interest rates may be increased, 2) Reports that the economy in China is slowing, and 3) Oil Prices at record lows.   Oil is at $42 a barrel, most in the industry feel $55 a barrel is where it needs to be for oil companies to be profitable and not lay off workers, yet allow prices at the gas pump to be not so expensive that it affects consumers.

While one should never argue or try to fight the market, I remain 100% S-Fund.   Had the above market behavior occurred in 2012, using my 2012 methodology, I probably would have been G-Fund by now.   However, I am running my “2012” system (in other words, exact same system as 2012 and prior, we can call this system Fed Trader 1.0) along side my beta system (a tweaked version of 2012), this Beta system was discussed in my Sept 10 2014 post, and my decision is to remain 100% S-Fund.   The beta-system is not for public consumption yet, however I do run it side-by-side with my other indicators.

It is important to mention that August and September are already documented in history as being bad months.   So even without interest rate fear mongering, or China issues, or other challenges, it is ops-normal for August and September to be poorly performing months.   Bring some headline news issues into the picture, and what do you get ?   You get a week like this one.   Using my weather analogy, if you are in Miami in August and surrounded by thunderstorms, it does not mean a Hurricane is coming.   Now, couple this with “Hurricane talk” on Twitter, cable news shows, and the Wall Street Journal, and now magically a hurricane is now approaching, even if only imagined.

Indeed, the raindrops are real, no argument there, and I suppose the question is “how much rain can I take” before we move to G-Fund.   I guess my answer is this, if you already went to G-Fund, nobody will second guess that decision.   However, me, personally, I am still in S-Fund, in light of the above observations.   All funds are down this month, and we will likely see I-Fund as having taken the majority of the damage, and thus be down the most. 

I invite folks to read my prior two posts, published Aug 10 and July 27 regarding Interest rate hikes and on China.

Friday August 21 is “options expiration day”  which for our purposes, all we care about is that volumes are increased (increased number of shares traded) on those days in the markets.  This makes it harder to assess what the market is “really” doing on those days, as the volume picture is clouded by the options expirations.

Everyone try to enjoy the weekend, something inside me tells me this storm cloud will pass.

Talk to you soon….

– Bill Pritchard




Improbable rate hike in September

Hello Folks

In the “good news” category, on Monday Aug-10, the markets rallied strongly, erasing all of last week’s losses.  The SP-500 Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), ticker symbol SPY, “gapped up” which is a bullish and positive sign.  While optimistic, last week’s poor performance cannot go ignored, nor can my numerous emails in my inbox, which I will basically answer via this post.  I have received quite a few questions, all reflecting nervousness over the past week in the markets- I hope to pacify and answer some of these questions here.  Let’s get started with some history:  The months of August and September are the worst performing months, market-wise, of the entire year.  So get ready for some rough waters until we are out of September.

We must view the prior week’s performance thru that optic, the optic of historical poor performance.  The rumored interest rate hike, rumored by those in the financial press to occur in September 2015 (the FOMC will meet Sept 16-17) remains front and center largely due to improving “jobs reports”, the most recent one having been released on Friday August 7, which reflected 5.3% unemployment rate.   This “good news” is “bad news” for the potential rate-hike-camp, as it reflects an improving economy, one which may warrant a rate hike.  On Monday Aug-10, FOMC Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer told Bloomberg News that inflation remains to be a concern and that a September rate hike is not assured yet.

This is not news for the subscribers of this free website, as I have discussed this very topic numerous times, actually five times,  and only now is the FOMC starting to talk about this with the media.   Bloomberg, CNBC, Marketwatch, have covered this topic only minimally.   I have covered it five times already.

Allow me to discuss why I believe the Sept rate hike will not happen.

The September FOMC meeting is rapidly approaching.  What is not so rapid is the movement of PCE Inflation data towards the desired 2% target.  I have uploaded a .PDF file of the most recent FOMC meeting minutes, with important areas highlighted, and bolded, by me:  FOMC-JUNE-MINUTES-2015

So, if we are to believe FOMC published statements and proclamations, we are “not there yet” regarding the PCE Inflation benchmark.  We are at 1.3% on PCE Inflation, not 2%.  Please see below graphics reflecting recent PCE measurements


CORE-PCE-INDEXUntil we get 2% inflation as determined by PCE measures, no rate hike in my opinion.

On to the markets:   The 2070 area represents a support level for the SP 500 Index.    We have had activity in and near that area since late July, until present, but the index has not gone below that level.   Hence it is now “support.”  See charts, representing the past 30 days of activity:


Fortunately, Monday Aug-10 trading got us up and away from the 2070 level.  It is important to monitor this, as a return to this level is undesirable.

My current TSP Allocation remains 100% S-Fund.  S-Fund is lagging the other funds and my goal is to simply be with the best performer; this appears to be I-Fund and next best is the C-Fund, on a 30 to 60-day look-back period.   I indeed may change my TSP Allocation later this month.

Takeaways from this post are:

1.   August and Sept are historically bad months, any down days should not result in panic attacks, absent additional information.  Summer rain in south Florida does not mean that a Hurricane is imminent.

2.  September interest rate hike is unlikely to occur, in my opinion.

3.  A TSP allocation re-adjustment may occur in my TSP later this month.

4.  PCE Inflation, not jobs data, is the FOMC’s roadblock right now.

That is all for now, thank you for reading.   I remain 100% S-Fund.  I hope everyone has a great week ahead.

Thank You

– Bill Pritchard








Does China Matter ?

Hello Folks

First, I remain 100% S-fund, even in light of some under-performance in the S-Fund the last few months.   It appears that we got past the Greece situation but more hurdles have been placed in front of us, namely “China.”   Before I go further, if you read my December 9, 2014 post, which describes basically the same thing that happened Monday July 27  (yes, we have seen this before), you will understand what is happening in China.   But, my question is:  does China really matter ?  Many on Wall Street are having panic attacks that China’s economy is propped up by government efforts, such as easy lending and low-interest rates, similar to USA in the 2000’s, peaking in 2007 and then crashing hard.   But if China did matter, why didn’t their markets behave in unison with the US markets, from 2009 to present ?  I guess my question is “why [does it matter] now?”   Lets look at a chart of the Shanghai Composite and SP 500.


What is immediately apparent is that the SP 500 has steadily climbed since 2009 (the mortgage and financial crisis was 2007-2009), while the Shanghai Composite has basically been sideways since 2009, only climbing in 2014 until present, at which point it started to crash.   So my point is this:  Since 2009, China and US markets did not act in similar manners, which typically occurs amongst global markets.   Lets look at additional major stock indexes, notably the Nikkei Index (Japan), FTSE “Footsee” Index (London), and the German DAX Index (Germany/Frankfurt).   While we study these indexes, lets agree that the prior US bear market ended in April 2009, and since 2009 has been in a uptrend.   Actually the chart says that, not me.    Observe how the other indexes (all major indexes above represent strong economies) behaved mostly in unison with the US Markets.   The SP 500 is now placed first, and the Shanghai Index placed last, to provide for easier analysis.


So, again, since 2009 China was disconnected from other world markets (I don’t care why, as it just doesn’t matter, I care more about how to I act based on the information in front of me), and suddenly, now, China is crashing, and now, for some reason or another, the US markets “should” crash along with China ?  Why now?  It never mattered before.   China’s bull market apparently got started in late 2014, and summer 2015 (nine months later) is now crashing.   So our 6 year bull market “should” crash because China’s nine month bull market is crashing ?   Maybe I am half looney-tunes to pontificate on this topic, but I think our recent sell offs are an over reaction to China.   Note also that I could be dead wrong and our US markets could be in for a painful crash.   I invite you to read my past posts however, and see how many times I have been wrong.

In short, it is best not to judge a market based on solely Monday action, so lets allow the week to play out and see how things look.  I am cautiously optimistic and remain 100% S-Fund.

Talk to you soon….

– Bill Pritchard






Market resumes strength – 100% S-Fund Continues

Hello Everyone

Well it appears that Greece waved the white flag and agreed to economic reforms, thus receiving additional European Central Bank (ECB) monetary assistance and backing.  While this is probably in the “then what has changed then?” category, it is important to note that this is the first time that the new Greek President and his team conceded that they indeed have issues and are agreeing to revamp things.   Whether it will happen or not, is to be seen, but the markets liked it.  As discussed in a prior post, Greece apparently “hit rock bottom” and finally admitted that a change of behavior is needed.

I felt fairly confident that this situation would be resolved, and thus did not bail out over to G-Fund.   The seas got somewhat rocky, but fortitude sometimes pays rewards, at least when you “call it” correctly anyway.   This time, my crystal-ball was right.

Monday July 13 and Thursday July 16 witnessed heavy buying activity/accumulation, reflecting a resumption of confidence in the markets by major funds.  This past week, I-Fund outperformed all others, largely due to the relief over Greece (international stocks climbed), but in my opinion, I-Fund carries increased risk which I am not inclined to play with right now (that may change in the future).   The S-Fund and C-Fund are performing almost equally, on a one-week to two-week look back.  I remain 100% S-Fund at the present time.

2135 is the new overhead resistance level on the SP 500, a penetration of that reflects new All-Time-Highs and hopefully a new uptrend in the markets.   We are away from the worrisome 2040 area.  See charts:


That is about all I have for now folks.  Again, things are starting to look positive… lets keep our fingers crossed.   I am 100% S-fund until further notice.

Thanks for reading…..

Bill Pritchard